Skip to content
Institutional Ledger

Institution record

ALB

ALB Limited

Risk level not supplied1 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
MFSATier-2
Malta Financial Services Authority
79767RegulatedALB Limited2017-03-30

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing ALB against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
ALB (this record)
MFSA
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
OKX
FSAMASVARA+6
9 / 9Risk level not supplied—1
Gate.io
GFSCSCBDMCC+6
9 / 9Risk level not supplied—0
Tradeview
FSCCIMALabuan+1
4 / 4Risk level not supplied—0
Deriv
FSCBVIFSCVFSC+2
5 / 5Risk level not supplied—0
Dlocal
FinCENFCAMFSA
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0

ALB: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is ALB's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, ALB (legal entity reference: ALB Limited) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: MFSA (Malta Financial Services Authority) — licence 79767, status: regulated, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official MFSA public register.

Which of ALB's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

ALB is registered at Level 2 of Melita Court, Giuseppe Cali Street c/w Abate Rigord Street, Ta’Xbiex, XBX 1420, Malta and tracked under our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (MFSA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is ALB's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

ALB carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to ALB's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with ALB (listed execution software: Kimura Trader), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to MFSA.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to ALB's supervisory scope.

All research →
ALB — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | Institutional Ledger