Skip to content
Institutional Ledger

Institution record

Bitpanda Wallet

Bitpanda

Risk level not supplied5 of 6 licences marked regulated
Source score
2.5
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
In our coverage
Austrian Financial Market Authority
FN 551181 kRegulatedBitpanda Financial Services GmbH2024
In our coverage
Austrian Financial Market Authority
FN 569240 vRegisteredBitpanda GmbH2024
In our coverage
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht
HRB 258842 BRegulatedBitpanda Asset Management GmbH2024
In our coverage
Austrian Financial Market Authority
FN 501412 xRegulatedBitpanda Payments GmbH2019
Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt)
Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt)
FN 511923 dRegulatedBitpanda Metals GmbH2020
Financial Conduct Authority
Financial Conduct Authority
11625148RegulatedBitpanda Custody Ltd2023

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Bitpanda Wallet against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Bitpanda Wallet (this record)
FMAFMABaFin+3
5 / 6Risk level not supplied2.50
Coinbase
BMAAMFMAS+6
9 / 9Risk level not supplied8.51
Saxo
MASFINMAFSA+5
8 / 8Risk level not supplied7.00
Blackwell Global
SFCSFCSCB+3
5 / 6Risk level not supplied6.30
Mizuho Securities
SFCMASFSA+4
6 / 7Risk level not supplied4.00
CMCMarkets
FMABaFinMAS+3
5 / 6Risk level not supplied7.10

Bitpanda Wallet: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Bitpanda Wallet's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Bitpanda Wallet (legal entity reference: Bitpanda) holds 6 recorded licence entries, of which 5 carry a "regulated" status and 6 are marked regulated or registered: FMA (Austrian Financial Market Authority) — licence FN 551181 k, status: regulated; FMA (Austrian Financial Market Authority) — licence FN 569240 v, status: registered; BaFin (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) — licence HRB 258842 B, status: regulated; FMA (Austrian Financial Market Authority) — licence FN 501412 x, status: regulated; Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt) — licence FN 511923 d, status: regulated; Financial Conduct Authority — licence 11625148, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FMA, BaFin, Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt) public register.

Which of Bitpanda Wallet's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

This directory focuses on crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers. 4 of Bitpanda Wallet's 6 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: FMA (licence FN 551181 k, regulated, entity: Bitpanda Financial Services GmbH); FMA (licence FN 569240 v, registered, entity: Bitpanda GmbH); BaFin (licence HRB 258842 B, regulated, entity: Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH); FMA (licence FN 501412 x, regulated, entity: Bitpanda Payments GmbH). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.

What is Bitpanda Wallet's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Bitpanda Wallet carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 2.5, risk & licensing: 2.2, brand: 3.0, market influence: 2.6, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Bitpanda Wallet's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Bitpanda Wallet, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (bitpanda.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FMA.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to Bitpanda Wallet's supervisory scope.

All research →
Bitpanda Wallet — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | Institutional Ledger