Skip to content
Institutional Ledger

Institution record

FXGlobe

FXGLOBE

Risk level not supplied8 of 8 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
FSATier-3
In our coverage
Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway
FT00080018RegulatedFXGLOBE LTD2013-12-16
AMFTier-1
In our coverage
Autorité des marchés financiers
55605RegulatedFXGlobe Ltd2013-12-16
VFSCOffshore
Vanuatu Financial Services Commission
700227RegulatedFS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED2023-02-28
CYSECTier-2
Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission
205/13RegulatedFXGlobe Ltd2013-06-20
CNBTier-2
Czech National Bank
Number pending checkRegulatedFXGlobe2013-12-16
FITier-1
Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority
33750RegulatedFXGlobe Ltd2013-12-16
KNFTier-2
Polish Financial Supervision Authority
Number pending checkRegulatedFXGlobe Ltd2013-12-16
BoLTier-2
Bank of Lithuania
Number pending checkRegulatedFXGlobe Ltd—

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing FXGlobe against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
FXGlobe (this record)
FSAAMFVFSC+5
8 / 8Risk level not supplied—0
Binance
FIU-INDAMFFinCEN+11
12 / 14Risk level not supplied—0
OKX
FSAMASVARA+6
9 / 9Risk level not supplied—1
BAM
AMFFIUVARA+12
15 / 15Risk level not supplied—0
Coinbase
MASBMAAMF+6
9 / 9Risk level not supplied—1
Saxo
FINMAMASAMF+5
8 / 8Risk level not supplied—0

FXGlobe: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is FXGlobe's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, FXGlobe (legal entity reference: FXGLOBE) holds 8 recorded licence entries, of which 8 carry a "regulated" status and 8 are marked regulated or registered: FSA (Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway) — licence FT00080018, status: regulated, Tier-3; AMF (Autorité des marchés financiers) — licence 55605, status: regulated, Tier-1; VFSC (Vanuatu Financial Services Commission) — licence 700227, status: regulated, Offshore; CYSEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) — licence 205/13, status: regulated, Tier-2; CNB (Czech National Bank) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-2; FI (Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority) — licence 33750, status: regulated, Tier-1; KNF (Polish Financial Supervision Authority) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-2; BoL (Bank of Lithuania) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FSA, AMF, VFSC public register.

Which of FXGlobe's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

This directory focuses on crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers. 2 of FXGlobe's 8 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: FSA (licence FT00080018, regulated, entity: FXGLOBE LTD); AMF (licence 55605, regulated, entity: FXGlobe Ltd). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.

What is FXGlobe's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

FXGlobe carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to FXGlobe's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with FXGlobe, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FSA.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to FXGlobe's supervisory scope.

All research →
FXGlobe — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | Institutional Ledger