Skip to content
Institutional Ledger

Institution record

GS

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Risk level not supplied2 of 2 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
OCCTier-1
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (U.S.)
24173RegulatedThe Goldman Sachs Trust Company, National Association—
FRSTier-1
U.S. Federal Reserve System
2182786RegulatedGOLDMAN SACHS BK USA/GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP THE—

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing GS against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
GS (this record)
OCCFRS
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
MUFG Bank
FSAMASPRA+4
7 / 7Risk level not supplied—0
Deutsche Bank AG
BaFinFRSECB+1
4 / 4Risk level not supplied—0
The Bank of New York Mellon
DFSFDICFRS
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0
Anchorage
MASOCC
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
Binance
FIU-INDAMFFinCEN+11
12 / 14Risk level not supplied—0

GS: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is GS's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, GS (legal entity reference: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) holds 2 recorded licence entries, of which 2 carry a "regulated" status and 2 are marked regulated or registered: OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (U.S.)) — licence 24173, status: regulated, Tier-1; FRS (U.S. Federal Reserve System) — licence 2182786, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official OCC, FRS public register.

Which of GS's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

GS is tracked under our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Asset management, Investment, Banking, Financial services) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 2 recorded licences (OCC, FRS) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is GS's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

GS carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to GS's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with GS, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (goldmansachs.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to OCC.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to GS's supervisory scope.

All research →

market-insights

HSBC CEO Warns the AI Boom Won't Make Every Data Center a Good Bet

HSBC CEO warns the AI boom won’t make every data center a good bet: Summary of the supplied material covering SFC, FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.

Read briefing →

regulation-and-institutional-markets

Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley are dominating the AI stock boom. Here's their edge — Institutional Ledger Market Brief

Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley are dominating the AI stock boom. Here's their edge: Summary of the supplied material covering $52, 80%, FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.

Read briefing →

Wholesale CBDC & Atomic Settlement

BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL) RWA Architecture: Cross-Border PvP Finality vs. Legacy Nostro/Vostro Pre-Funding ($2.78B On-Chain AUM (Q3 2026) Benchmark)

BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL) RWA Architecture (BLACKROCK-BUIDL) stands at $2.78B (On-Chain AUM (Q3 2026)) (Source: SEC Reg D / BNY Mellon / Securitize, 2026-10-20), governing unified ledger

Read briefing →

Digital Asset Custody & Prudential Accounting

Franklin OnChain U.S. Government Money Fund (BENJI / FOBXX) 1940 Act Ledger: Cross-Border PvP Finality vs. Legacy Nostro/Vostro Pre-Funding ($2.42B On-Chain AUM (Q3 2026) Benchmark)

Franklin OnChain U.S. Government Money Fund (BENJI / FOBXX) 1940 Act Ledger (FRANKLIN-BENJI) stands at $2.42B (On-Chain AUM (Q3 2026)) (Source: SEC Form N-MFP3 / Franklin Advisers, 2026-10-20), governing unified ledger s

Read briefing →
GS — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | Institutional Ledger