Skip to content
Institutional Ledger

Institution record

IBROKER

IBROKER GLOBAL MARKETS, S.V., S.A.

Risk level not supplied0 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
CNMVTier-1
Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores
260Suspected cloneIBROKER GLOBAL MARKETS, S.V., S.A.2016-05-13

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing IBROKER against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
IBROKER (this record)
CNMV
0 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
Squared Financial
FSAAMFCYSEC+1
3 / 4Risk level not supplied—0
FXORO
FSACYSECCNMV
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0
Capex
CYSECCNMVFSCA
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0
XTB
FCACNMVCYSEC
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0
Binance
FIU-INDAMFFinCEN+11
12 / 14Risk level not supplied—0

IBROKER: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is IBROKER's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, IBROKER (legal entity reference: IBROKER GLOBAL MARKETS, S.V., S.A.) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 0 carry a "regulated" status and 0 are marked regulated or registered: CNMV (Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores) — licence 260, status: suspected clone, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official CNMV public register.

Which of IBROKER's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

IBROKER is tracked under our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (CNMV) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is IBROKER's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

IBROKER carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts and 1 licence record with elevated status flags (CNMV: suspected clone). Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to IBROKER's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with IBROKER, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to CNMV.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to IBROKER's supervisory scope.

All research →
IBROKER — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | Institutional Ledger