Institution record
OANDA
OANDA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
- Source score
- 9.1
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In our coverage Monetary Authority of Singapore | Not supplied | Regulated | OANDA ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD. | — | |
In our coverage Financial Services Agency | Kanto Local Finance Bureau (FIBO) No. 2137 | Regulated | OANDA Japan Inc | 2009-03-02 | |
NFA National Futures Association | 0325821 | Regulated | OANDA CORPORATION | 2003-03-14 | |
IIROC Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada | Not supplied | Regulated | OANDA (Canada) Corporation ULC | — | |
ASIC Australian Securities and Investments Commission | 412981 | Regulated | OANDA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD | 2012-03-26 | |
Financial Conduct Authority Financial Conduct Authority | 542574 | Regulated | OANDA Europe Limited | 2011-05-17 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing OANDA against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OANDA (this record) | MASFSANFA+3 | 6 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | 9.1 | 0 |
| Coinbase | BMAAMFMAS+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | 8.5 | 1 |
| OKX | AMFMASVARA+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | 7.2 | 1 |
| Saxo | MASFINMAFSA+5 | 8 / 8 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 |
| Swissquote | FINMAMASDFSA+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | 6.5 | 0 |
| Blackwell Global | SFCSFCSCB+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | 6.3 | 0 |
OANDA: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is OANDA's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, OANDA (legal entity reference: OANDA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD) holds 6 recorded licence entries, of which 6 carry a "regulated" status and 6 are marked regulated or registered: MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; FSA (Financial Services Agency) — licence Kanto Local Finance Bureau (FIBO) No. 2137, status: regulated; NFA (National Futures Association) — licence 0325821, status: regulated; IIROC (Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 412981, status: regulated; Financial Conduct Authority — licence 542574, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official MAS, FSA, NFA public register.
Which of OANDA's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
This directory focuses on crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers. 2 of OANDA's 6 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: MAS (licence Not supplied, regulated, entity: OANDA ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD.); FSA (licence Kanto Local Finance Bureau (FIBO) No. 2137, regulated, entity: OANDA Japan Inc). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.
What is OANDA's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
OANDA carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 9.1, risk & licensing: 9.1, brand: 9.3, market influence: 8.9, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to OANDA's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with OANDA, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (oanda.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to MAS.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to OANDA's supervisory scope.
Tokenized RWA & Treasury Funds
MAS Project Guardian & Global Layer One (GL1) Institutional Tokenization: Atomic T+0 DvP Settlement & Intraday Repo Collateral Mobility (40+ Participating G-SIBs & Managers Benchmark)
MAS Project Guardian & Global Layer One (GL1) Institutional Tokenization (MAS-GUARDIAN) stands at 40+ (Participating G-SIBs & Managers) (Source: Monetary Authority of Singapore, 2026-10-20), governing eliminating T+1 Fed
Wholesale CBDC & Atomic Settlement
MAS Project Guardian & Global Layer One (GL1) Institutional Tokenization: Institutional AUM, 7-Day Net Yield & Expense Ratio Benchmarks (40+ Participating G-SIBs & Managers Benchmark)
MAS Project Guardian & Global Layer One (GL1) Institutional Tokenization (MAS-GUARDIAN) stands at 40+ (Participating G-SIBs & Managers) (Source: Monetary Authority of Singapore, 2026-10-20), governing comparing on-chain
Digital Asset Custody & Prudential Accounting
MAS Project Guardian & Global Layer One (GL1) Institutional Tokenization: G-SIB Balance-Sheet SLR Relief & Prudential Capital Treatment (40+ Participating G-SIBs & Managers Benchmark)
MAS Project Guardian & Global Layer One (GL1) Institutional Tokenization (MAS-GUARDIAN) stands at 40+ (Participating G-SIBs & Managers) (Source: Monetary Authority of Singapore, 2026-10-20), governing SAB 122 off-balance
Regulated Stablecoins & Collateral Mobility
MAS Project Guardian & Global Layer One (GL1) Institutional Tokenization: Bankruptcy-Remote Custody Segregation & SEC Rule 15c3-3 Controls (40+ Participating G-SIBs & Managers Benchmark)
MAS Project Guardian & Global Layer One (GL1) Institutional Tokenization (MAS-GUARDIAN) stands at 40+ (Participating G-SIBs & Managers) (Source: Monetary Authority of Singapore, 2026-10-20), governing qualified custodian