Skip to content
Institutional Ledger

Institution record

Pacific

Pacific Forex Asset Management

Risk level not supplied1 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
1
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
LabuanOffshore
Labuan Financial Services Authority
Number pending checkRegulatedPACIFIC INDEX INTERNATIONAL LTD_—

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Pacific against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Pacific (this record)
Labuan
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—1
Tradeview
FSCCIMALabuan+1
4 / 4Risk level not supplied—0
Deriv
FSCBVIFSCVFSC+2
5 / 5Risk level not supplied—0
ICM
FSRALabuanFSCA+1
3 / 4Risk level not supplied—0
VDX
FSCLabuanFCA
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0
AIMS
ASICLabuan
1 / 2Risk level not supplied—0

Pacific: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Pacific's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Pacific (legal entity reference: Pacific Forex Asset Management) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: Labuan (Labuan Financial Services Authority) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Offshore. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official Labuan public register.

Which of Pacific's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

Pacific is registered at 245 Grand Street, 2nd Floor, New York, 10002, United States and tracked under our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers scope based on its institutional service profile (Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (Labuan) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is Pacific's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Pacific carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 1 regulatory warning or complaint count. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Pacific's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Pacific, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 1 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to Labuan.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to Pacific's supervisory scope.

All research →
Pacific — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | Institutional Ledger