Skip to content
Institutional Ledger

Institution record

Pyypl

Pyypl Ltd

Risk level not supplied2 of 2 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
FSRATier-2
In our coverage
Financial Services Regulatory Authority
170031RegulatedPyypl Ltd2021‐03‐28
CBBTier-2
Central Bank of Bahrain
Number pending checkRegulatedPyypl Ltd—

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Pyypl against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Pyypl (this record)
FSRACBB
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
Binance
FIU-INDAMFFinCEN+11
12 / 14Risk level not supplied—0
AvaTrade
FSAFSRAFSCA+5
8 / 8Risk level not supplied—0
ICM
FSRALabuanFSCA+1
3 / 4Risk level not supplied—0
BitOasis
VARACBB
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
OKX
FSAMASVARA+6
9 / 9Risk level not supplied—1

Pyypl: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Pyypl's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Pyypl (legal entity reference: Pyypl Ltd) holds 2 recorded licence entries, of which 2 carry a "regulated" status and 2 are marked regulated or registered: FSRA (Financial Services Regulatory Authority) — licence 170031, status: regulated, Tier-2; CBB (Central Bank of Bahrain) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FSRA, CBB public register.

Which of Pyypl's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

This directory focuses on crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers. 1 of Pyypl's 2 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: FSRA (licence 170031, regulated, entity: Pyypl Ltd). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.

What is Pyypl's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Pyypl carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Pyypl's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Pyypl, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (pyypl.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FSRA.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to Pyypl's supervisory scope.

All research →