Institution record
RedDuck
- Source score
- 3.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
No licence records on file for this institution.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing RedDuck against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RedDuck (this record) | None on file | 0 / 0 | Risk level not supplied | 3.0 | 0 |
| Coinbase | BMAAMFMAS+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | 8.5 | 1 |
| OKX | AMFMASVARA+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | 7.2 | 1 |
| Saxo | MASFINMAFSA+5 | 8 / 8 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 |
| Swissquote | FINMAMASDFSA+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | 6.5 | 0 |
| Blackwell Global | SFCSFCSCB+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | 6.3 | 0 |
RedDuck: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is RedDuck's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
Our imported dataset currently holds 0 verified regulatory licence records for RedDuck (RedDuck), tracked under our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers coverage scope. Prospective counterparties should request primary registration certificates and cross-check the contracting entity directly on the relevant national financial supervisor's public register before onboarding.
Which of RedDuck's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
RedDuck is tracked under our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Cryptocurrencies, Asset management, Investment) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 0 recorded licences (none on file) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is RedDuck's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
RedDuck carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 3.0, risk & licensing: 3.0, brand: 3.0, market influence: 3.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to RedDuck's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with RedDuck, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to the supervising authority.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to RedDuck's supervisory scope.
market-insights
HSBC CEO Warns the AI Boom Won't Make Every Data Center a Good Bet
HSBC CEO warns the AI boom won’t make every data center a good bet: Summary of the supplied material covering SFC, FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.
regulation-and-institutional-markets
Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley are dominating the AI stock boom. Here's their edge — Institutional Ledger Market Brief
Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley are dominating the AI stock boom. Here's their edge: Summary of the supplied material covering $52, 80%, FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.
Institutional Custody & Digital Ledger
Institutional Tokenized Treasuries, Wholesale CBDC Delivery-versus-Payment (DvP), and BCBS SCO60 Bank Capital Standards in 2026
An institutional ledger deep dive into $3.2B+ tokenized US Treasury funds, intraday bilateral and cleared repo collateral mobility, BIS Project Agorá and MAS Project Guardian atomic DvP settlement, and BCBS SCO60 Group 1a/1b vs Group 2 (1,250% risk weight) prudential capital treatment.
Tokenized RWA & Custody
DTCC Smart NAV Pilot, Canton Network Institutional Repo Mobility & Tokenized Money Market Fund Intraday Collateral Settlement
Tokenized Money Market Fund (TMMF) intraday collateral settlement refers to atomic Delivery-versus-Payment (DvP) transfers that cut tri-party repo margin buffers by 38% [38% + Margin Reduction + BIS Working Paper No. 1184 + Q3 2026] across DTCC Smart NAV and Canton Network rails.