Skip to content
Institutional Ledger

Institution record

SGT

Sterling Gent Trading Ltd

Risk level not supplied0 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
4.0
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
BVIFSC
British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission
SIBA/L/11/0987OffshoreSterling Gent Trading Ltd.—

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing SGT against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
SGT (this record)
BVIFSC
0 / 1Risk level not supplied4.00
bybit
VARAFMABVIFSC+5
4 / 8Risk level not supplied8.00
BCR
BVIFSCASIC
1 / 2Risk level not supplied7.00
easyMarkets
CYSECFinancial Services Authority SeychellesBVIFSC+2
3 / 5Risk level not supplied5.00
GKFX Prime
BVIFSC
0 / 1Risk level not supplied5.00
GKFX Prime
BVIFSCCommodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)MFSA+2
4 / 5Risk level not supplied4.00

SGT: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is SGT's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, SGT (legal entity reference: Sterling Gent Trading Ltd) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 0 carry a "regulated" status and 0 are marked regulated or registered: BVIFSC (British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission) — licence SIBA/L/11/0987, status: offshore. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official BVIFSC public register.

Which of SGT's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

SGT is registered at The Rosebank Building, Suite 334 11 Bermudiana Road, Hamilton HM11 Bermuda and tracked under our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers scope based on its institutional service profile (Cryptocurrencies, CFDs, Indices, Forex, Stocks) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (BVIFSC) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is SGT's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

SGT carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 4.0, risk & licensing: 4.0, brand: 4.0, market influence: 4.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to SGT's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with SGT, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (sgt.markets) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to BVIFSC.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to SGT's supervisory scope.

All research →
SGT — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | Institutional Ledger