Institution record
Tranquil Finance
- Source score
- 1.5
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
No licence records on file for this institution.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Tranquil Finance against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tranquil Finance (this record) | None on file | 0 / 0 | Risk level not supplied | 1.5 | 0 |
| Coinbase | BMAAMFMAS+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | 8.5 | 1 |
| OKX | AMFMASVARA+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | 7.2 | 1 |
| Saxo | MASFINMAFSA+5 | 8 / 8 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 |
| Swissquote | FINMAMASDFSA+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | 6.5 | 0 |
| Blackwell Global | SFCSFCSCB+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | 6.3 | 0 |
Tranquil Finance: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Tranquil Finance's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
Our imported dataset currently holds 0 verified regulatory licence records for Tranquil Finance (Tranquil Finance), tracked under our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers coverage scope. Prospective counterparties should request primary registration certificates and cross-check the contracting entity directly on the relevant national financial supervisor's public register before onboarding.
Which of Tranquil Finance's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Tranquil Finance is tracked under our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Cryptocurrencies) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 0 recorded licences (none on file) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Tranquil Finance's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Tranquil Finance carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 1.5, risk & licensing: 1.5, brand: 1.5, market influence: 1.5, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Tranquil Finance's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Tranquil Finance, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to the supervising authority.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to Tranquil Finance's supervisory scope.
Institutional Custody & Digital Ledger
Institutional Tokenized Treasuries, Wholesale CBDC Delivery-versus-Payment (DvP), and BCBS SCO60 Bank Capital Standards in 2026
An institutional ledger deep dive into $3.2B+ tokenized US Treasury funds, intraday bilateral and cleared repo collateral mobility, BIS Project Agorá and MAS Project Guardian atomic DvP settlement, and BCBS SCO60 Group 1a/1b vs Group 2 (1,250% risk weight) prudential capital treatment.
Tokenized RWA & Custody
DTCC Smart NAV Pilot, Canton Network Institutional Repo Mobility & Tokenized Money Market Fund Intraday Collateral Settlement
Tokenized Money Market Fund (TMMF) intraday collateral settlement refers to atomic Delivery-versus-Payment (DvP) transfers that cut tri-party repo margin buffers by 38% [38% + Margin Reduction + BIS Working Paper No. 1184 + Q3 2026] across DTCC Smart NAV and Canton Network rails.
market-insights
IMF-World Bank Bangkok Meetings 2026: Debt, AI, and Ukraine Dominate as China Fades from Center Stage
The world’s finance chiefs see new risks — and less China angst: Summary of the supplied material covering 2018, SFC. Source details have not been independently verified.
market-insights
HSBC CEO Warns the AI Boom Won't Make Every Data Center a Good Bet
HSBC CEO warns the AI boom won’t make every data center a good bet: Summary of the supplied material covering SFC, FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.