Institution record
Bitpanda
Bitpanda GmbH
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMATier-1 In our coverage Austrian Financial Market Authority | FN 501412 x | Regulated | Bitpanda Payments GmbH | 2019 | |
BaFinTier-1 In our coverage Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht | HRB 258842 B | Regulated | Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH | 2024 | |
FMATier-1 In our coverage Austrian Financial Market Authority | FN 569240 v | Registered | Bitpanda GmbH | 2024 | |
FMATier-1 In our coverage Austrian Financial Market Authority | FN 551181 k | Regulated | Bitpanda Financial Services GmbH | 2024 | |
MBATier-2 Vienna District Office 2 (trade licensing) | FN 511923 d | Regulated | Bitpanda Metals GmbH | 2020 | |
FCATier-1 Financial Conduct Authority | 11625148 | Regulated | Bitpanda Custody Ltd | 2023 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Bitpanda against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitpanda (this record) | FMABaFinFMA+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Coinbase | MASBMAAMF+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | — | 1 |
| Saxo | FINMAMASAMF+5 | 8 / 8 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Mizuho Securities | BaFinMASSFC+4 | 6 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Blackwell Global | SFCSCBSFC+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| BitGo | MASFinCENBaFin+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
Bitpanda: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Bitpanda's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Bitpanda (legal entity reference: Bitpanda GmbH) holds 6 recorded licence entries, of which 5 carry a "regulated" status and 6 are marked regulated or registered: FMA (Austrian Financial Market Authority) — licence FN 501412 x, status: regulated, Tier-1; BaFin (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) — licence HRB 258842 B, status: regulated, Tier-1; FMA (Austrian Financial Market Authority) — licence FN 569240 v, status: registered, Tier-1; FMA (Austrian Financial Market Authority) — licence FN 551181 k, status: regulated, Tier-1; MBA (Vienna District Office 2 (trade licensing)) — licence FN 511923 d, status: regulated, Tier-2; FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) — licence 11625148, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FMA, BaFin, MBA public register.
Which of Bitpanda's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
This directory focuses on crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers. 4 of Bitpanda's 6 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: FMA (licence FN 501412 x, regulated, entity: Bitpanda Payments GmbH); BaFin (licence HRB 258842 B, regulated, entity: Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH); FMA (licence FN 569240 v, registered, entity: Bitpanda GmbH); FMA (licence FN 551181 k, regulated, entity: Bitpanda Financial Services GmbH). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.
What is Bitpanda's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Bitpanda carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Bitpanda's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Bitpanda, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (bitpanda.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FMA.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to Bitpanda's supervisory scope.
market-insights
HSBC CEO Warns the AI Boom Won't Make Every Data Center a Good Bet
HSBC CEO warns the AI boom won’t make every data center a good bet: Summary of the supplied material covering SFC, FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.
market-insights
Premarket Movers: RTX, General Motors, Northrop Grumman, Steel Dynamics Lead Early Session Swings
Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: RTX, General Motors, Northrop Grumman, Steel Dynamics & more: Summary of the supplied material covering FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.
regulation-and-institutional-markets
Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley are dominating the AI stock boom. Here's their edge — Institutional Ledger Market Brief
Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley are dominating the AI stock boom. Here's their edge: Summary of the supplied material covering $52, 80%, FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.
Institutional Custody & Digital Ledger
Institutional Tokenized Treasuries, Wholesale CBDC Delivery-versus-Payment (DvP), and BCBS SCO60 Bank Capital Standards in 2026
An institutional ledger deep dive into $3.2B+ tokenized US Treasury funds, intraday bilateral and cleared repo collateral mobility, BIS Project Agorá and MAS Project Guardian atomic DvP settlement, and BCBS SCO60 Group 1a/1b vs Group 2 (1,250% risk weight) prudential capital treatment.