Institution record
CAPITAL
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing CAPITAL against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPITAL (this record) | SFC | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Mizuho Securities | BaFinMASSFC+4 | 6 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Blackwell Global | SFCSCBSFC+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Hash | FSAMASSFC+3 | 6 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Swissquote | DFSAFINMAMAS+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Eddid Financial | MASSFCFINRA+1 | 2 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
CAPITAL: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is CAPITAL's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, CAPITAL (legal entity reference: CAPITAL) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: SFC (Securities and Futures Commission) — licence ACC324, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official SFC public register.
Which of CAPITAL's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
This directory focuses on crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers. 1 of CAPITAL's 1 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: SFC (licence ACC324, regulated). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.
What is CAPITAL's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
CAPITAL carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to CAPITAL's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with CAPITAL, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SFC.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to CAPITAL's supervisory scope.
Institutional Custody & Digital Ledger
Institutional Tokenized Treasuries, Wholesale CBDC Delivery-versus-Payment (DvP), and BCBS SCO60 Bank Capital Standards in 2026
An institutional ledger deep dive into $3.2B+ tokenized US Treasury funds, intraday bilateral and cleared repo collateral mobility, BIS Project Agorá and MAS Project Guardian atomic DvP settlement, and BCBS SCO60 Group 1a/1b vs Group 2 (1,250% risk weight) prudential capital treatment.
Tokenized RWA & Treasury Funds
Ondo Finance Short-Term U.S. Government Bond (OUSG & USDY) Tokenized Notes: G-SIB Balance-Sheet SLR Relief & Prudential Capital Treatment ($2.65B Combined RWA AUM Benchmark)
Ondo Finance Short-Term U.S. Government Bond (OUSG & USDY) Tokenized Notes (ONDO-OUSG-USDY) stands at $2.65B (Combined RWA AUM) (Source: Institutional RWA Registry, 2026-10-20), governing SAB 122 off-balance-sheet custod
Tokenized RWA & Treasury Funds
Basel III BCBS SCO60 (d545) Group 1a vs. Group 2 Cryptoasset Capital Standard: Bankruptcy-Remote Custody Segregation & SEC Rule 15c3-3 Controls (1250% Unbacked Group 2b Risk Weight Benchmark)
Basel III BCBS SCO60 (d545) Group 1a vs. Group 2 Cryptoasset Capital Standard (BCBS-SCO60-D545) stands at 1250% (Unbacked Group 2b Risk Weight) (Source: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2026-10-20), governing qual
Tokenized RWA & Treasury Funds
Basel III BCBS SCO60 (d545) Group 1a vs. Group 2 Cryptoasset Capital Standard: Daily NAV Attestation, Transfer Agency Sync & Oracle Verification (1250% Unbacked Group 2b Risk Weight Benchmark)
Basel III BCBS SCO60 (d545) Group 1a vs. Group 2 Cryptoasset Capital Standard (BCBS-SCO60-D545) stands at 1250% (Unbacked Group 2b Risk Weight) (Source: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2026-10-20), governing auto
