Skip to content
Institutional Ledger

Institution record

IFX

IFX Brokers Holdings (Pty) Ltd

Risk level not supplied0 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
FSCATier-2
Financial Sector Conduct Authority
48021Exceeded scopeIFX Brokers Holdings (Pty) Ltd2017-06-06

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing IFX against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
IFX (this record)
FSCA
0 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
BAM
AMFFIUVARA+12
15 / 15Risk level not supplied—0
AvaTrade
FSAFSRAFSCA+5
8 / 8Risk level not supplied—0
FxPro
BaFinSCBFSCA+3
4 / 6Risk level not supplied—0
ThinkMarkets
FSAFSAFCA+3
4 / 6Risk level not supplied—1
AVA
FSRAFSACBI+2
5 / 5Risk level not supplied—0

IFX: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is IFX's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, IFX (legal entity reference: IFX Brokers Holdings (Pty) Ltd) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 0 carry a "regulated" status and 0 are marked regulated or registered: FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) — licence 48021, status: exceeded scope, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FSCA public register.

Which of IFX's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

IFX is registered at 79 DA GAMA ROAD JEFFREYS BAY 6630 79 Da Gama Road, Jeffreys Bay, South Africa and tracked under our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (FSCA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is IFX's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

IFX carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts and 1 licence record with elevated status flags (FSCA: exceeded scope). Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to IFX's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with IFX, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FSCA.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to IFX's supervisory scope.

All research →
IFX — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | Institutional Ledger