Institution record
ATC Brokers
- Source score
- 6.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In our coverage Cayman Islands Monetary Authority | 1448274 | Regulated | ATC Brokers Limited | 2018-11-05 | |
NFA National Futures Association | 0358522 | Registered | ATC BROKERS | 2005-09-08 | |
Financial Conduct Authority Financial Conduct Authority | 591361 | Regulated | ATC Brokers | — |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing ATC Brokers against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATC Brokers (this record) | CIMANFAFinancial Conduct Authority | 2 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 |
| Coinbase | BMAAMFMAS+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | 8.5 | 1 |
| Saxo | MASFINMAFSA+5 | 8 / 8 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 |
| Blackwell Global | SFCSFCSCB+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | 6.3 | 0 |
| Mizuho Securities | SFCMASFSA+4 | 6 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | 4.0 | 0 |
| Bitpanda Wallet | FMAFMABaFin+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | 2.5 | 0 |
ATC Brokers: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is ATC Brokers's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, ATC Brokers (legal entity reference: ATC Brokers) holds 3 recorded licence entries, of which 2 carry a "regulated" status and 3 are marked regulated or registered: CIMA (Cayman Islands Monetary Authority) — licence 1448274, status: regulated; NFA (National Futures Association) — licence 0358522, status: registered; Financial Conduct Authority — licence 591361, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official CIMA, NFA, Financial Conduct Authority public register.
Which of ATC Brokers's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
This directory focuses on crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers. 1 of ATC Brokers's 3 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: CIMA (licence 1448274, regulated, entity: ATC Brokers Limited). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.
What is ATC Brokers's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
ATC Brokers carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 6.0, risk & licensing: 6.0, brand: 6.0, market influence: 5.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to ATC Brokers's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with ATC Brokers, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to CIMA.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to ATC Brokers's supervisory scope.
Digital assets
Bitcoin near $81,000 after a $635 million ETF outflow: Friday’s tape, not a Saturday price
The figure set for this note is Friday’s, not a weekend quote. CoinDesk had bitcoin around $81,000 to $81,500, US spot bitcoin ETFs with a $635 million outflow on Thursday, and an average ETF cost basis of $82,313.
Institutional Crypto ETFs, Tokenized RWA & Market Structure
Institutional Digital Asset Liquidity in October 2026: Bitcoin's $81,600 Consolidation, the $1B ETF Inflow Rebound, Cboe BZX 3x ETP Clearances, and Tokenized RWA Collateral Velocity
An institutional market structure and quantitative liquidity dossier examining Bitcoin's late-October 2026 consolidation at $81,600 amid a -2.6% Nasdaq selloff, the $1.04 billion three-day spot ETF inflow reversal, SEC listing clearances for Cboe BZX 3x leveraged Bitcoin and Ether ETPs, Senate Clarity Act legislative delays, and tokenized US Treasury RWA collateral velocity yielding 4.95% across prime brokerage and derivatives margin rails.
Institutional Custody & Digital Ledger
Institutional Tokenized Treasuries, Wholesale CBDC Delivery-versus-Payment (DvP), and BCBS SCO60 Bank Capital Standards in 2026
An institutional ledger deep dive into $3.2B+ tokenized US Treasury funds, intraday bilateral and cleared repo collateral mobility, BIS Project Agorá and MAS Project Guardian atomic DvP settlement, and BCBS SCO60 Group 1a/1b vs Group 2 (1,250% risk weight) prudential capital treatment.
Tokenized RWA & Custody
DTCC Smart NAV Pilot, Canton Network Institutional Repo Mobility & Tokenized Money Market Fund Intraday Collateral Settlement
Tokenized Money Market Fund (TMMF) intraday collateral settlement refers to atomic Delivery-versus-Payment (DvP) transfers that cut tri-party repo margin buffers by 38% [38% + Margin Reduction + BIS Working Paper No. 1184 + Q3 2026] across DTCC Smart NAV and Canton Network rails.