Institution record
Fortrade
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASICTier-1 Australian Securities and Investments Commission | 493520 | Regulated | FORT SECURITIES AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. | 2019-02-06 | |
NBRBTier-2 National Bank of the Republic of Belarus | 193075810 | Regulated | Fort Securities BLR Limited Liability Company | 2018-06-19 | |
IIROCTier-1 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada | Not supplied | Regulated | Fortrade Canada Limited | — | |
CYSECTier-2 Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission | 385/20 | Regulated | Fortrade Cyprus Ltd | 2020-03-09 | |
FCATier-1 Financial Conduct Authority | 609970 | Regulated | Fortrade Limited | 2014-04-17 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Fortrade against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortrade (this record) | ASICNBRBIIROC+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Coinbase | MASBMAAMF+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | — | 1 |
| Saxo | FINMAMASAMF+5 | 8 / 8 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Mizuho Securities | BaFinMASSFC+4 | 6 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Bitpanda | FMABaFinFMA+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Blackwell Global | SFCSCBSFC+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
Fortrade: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Fortrade's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Fortrade (legal entity reference: Fortrade) holds 5 recorded licence entries, of which 5 carry a "regulated" status and 5 are marked regulated or registered: ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 493520, status: regulated, Tier-1; NBRB (National Bank of the Republic of Belarus) — licence 193075810, status: regulated, Tier-2; IIROC (Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated, Tier-1; CYSEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) — licence 385/20, status: regulated, Tier-2; FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) — licence 609970, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official ASIC, NBRB, IIROC public register.
Which of Fortrade's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Fortrade is registered at 144 Mayakovsky St., 8th floor, room 11, 220028, Minsk, Republic of Belarus and tracked under our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 5 recorded licences (ASIC, NBRB, IIROC, CYSEC, FCA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Fortrade's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Fortrade carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Fortrade's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Fortrade, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to ASIC.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to Fortrade's supervisory scope.
market-insights
HSBC CEO Warns the AI Boom Won't Make Every Data Center a Good Bet
HSBC CEO warns the AI boom won’t make every data center a good bet: Summary of the supplied material covering SFC, FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.
market-insights
Premarket Movers: RTX, General Motors, Northrop Grumman, Steel Dynamics Lead Early Session Swings
Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: RTX, General Motors, Northrop Grumman, Steel Dynamics & more: Summary of the supplied material covering FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.
regulation-and-institutional-markets
Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley are dominating the AI stock boom. Here's their edge — Institutional Ledger Market Brief
Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley are dominating the AI stock boom. Here's their edge: Summary of the supplied material covering $52, 80%, FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.
Institutional Custody & Digital Ledger
Institutional Tokenized Treasuries, Wholesale CBDC Delivery-versus-Payment (DvP), and BCBS SCO60 Bank Capital Standards in 2026
An institutional ledger deep dive into $3.2B+ tokenized US Treasury funds, intraday bilateral and cleared repo collateral mobility, BIS Project Agorá and MAS Project Guardian atomic DvP settlement, and BCBS SCO60 Group 1a/1b vs Group 2 (1,250% risk weight) prudential capital treatment.