Institution record
EC Markets
Ec Markets Limited
- Source score
- 7.0
- Source exposures
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In our coverage Financial Markets Authority | 197465 | Regulated | EC MARKETS FINANCIAL LIMITED | 2015-01-20 | |
Australian Securities and Investments Commission | 414198 | Regulated | EC MARKETS FINANCIAL LIMITED | 2012-02-17 | |
Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA) | 571881 | Regulated | EC Markets Group Ltd | 2012-08-08 | |
Financial Services Commission, Mauritius | GB2100130 | Offshore | EC MARKETS LIMITED | 2022-06-20 | |
Financial Services Authority Seychelles | SD009 | Offshore | EC Markets Limited | — |
Peer source record comparison
Compare imported fields for EC Markets and other records in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset. These are not independent audit findings.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Source exposures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC Markets (this record) | FMAASICFinancial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)+2 | 3 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 |
SCBGFSCDMCC+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | 5.8 | 0 | |
FSAASICCBI+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 | |
MASASICCYSEC+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 6.3 | 0 | |
CyFOASICFinancial Conduct Authority+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 | |
Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)ASICCYSEC | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 |
EC Markets: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is EC Markets's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
The imported dataset contains 5 licence entries associated with EC Markets (legal entity reference: Ec Markets Limited); 3 are labelled "regulated" and 3 are labelled regulated or registered: FMA (Financial Markets Authority) — licence 197465, status: regulated; ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 414198, status: regulated; Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA) — licence 571881, status: regulated; Financial Services Commission, Mauritius — licence GB2100130, status: offshore; Financial Services Authority Seychelles — licence SD009, status: offshore. These fields are not independent confirmation of current authorisation. Check the exact contracting entity and registration number on the official FMA, ASIC, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA) public register.
Which of EC Markets's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
This directory focuses on crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers. 1 of EC Markets's 5 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: FMA (licence 197465, regulated, entity: EC MARKETS FINANCIAL LIMITED). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.
What is EC Markets's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
EC Markets carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 7.0, risk & licensing: 7.0, brand: 7.0, market influence: 6.0, user reputation: 0.0). The imported source lists 0 exposure entries. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to EC Markets's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with EC Markets (listed execution software: MT4), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 source exposure entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FMA.