1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
APROBIT vs bybit: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of APROBIT (APROBIT) and bybit (bybit) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers
- APROBIT 6D Score
- 5.0
- bybit 6D Score
- 8.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 4
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
bybit outranks APROBIT by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (8.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, APROBIT holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas bybit holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 8 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | APROBIT | bybit | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 8.0 | +3.0 | bybit |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 8.0 | +3.0 | bybit |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 6.0 | +3.0 | bybit |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 8.0 | +3.0 | bybit |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 8.0 | +3.0 | bybit |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: APROBIT vs bybit
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | APROBIT | bybit |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | APROBIT | bybit |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 4 regulated / 8 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | FMA: Not suppliedVARA: Not suppliedCMB: Not suppliedNational Bank of Georgia (NBG): Not suppliedCYSEC: Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | South Korea Seoul Gangnam District Daechi-dong 516-4 | 40A Orchard Road, Macdonald House, #03-01, Singapore 238838 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Bybit Fintech Limited |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Korean | English, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Indonesian, Spanish, Filipino, Kazakh, Polish and other languages |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare APROBIT and bybit against other regulated peers in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: APROBIT vs bybit
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: APROBIT or bybit?
bybit holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 0). Specifically, APROBIT maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas bybit maintains 8 recorded filing(s) (FMA, VARA, CMB, National Bank of Georgia (NBG)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between APROBIT and bybit?
In Institutional Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), APROBIT records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with bybit at 8.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 8.0, Brand: 8.0, Market Influence: 8.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 6.0).
How do APROBIT and bybit differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
APROBIT lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while bybit lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [Bybit Fintech Limited]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: APROBIT or bybit?
APROBIT carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while bybit carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.