Skip to content
Institutional Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

AVIC vs BDS: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of AVIC (AVIC Intl Group Holdings Ltd.) and BDS (BDS Swiss Markets Global Services Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers

AVIC 6D Score
1.0
BDS 6D Score
1.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: avic-vs-bds

AVIC and BDS are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.0 vs 1.0)

On supervisory breadth, AVIC holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas BDS holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightAVICBDSScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: AVIC vs BDS

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: AVIC vs BDS
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between AVIC and BDS.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeAVICBDS
Primary Legal NameAVIC Intl Group Holdings Ltd.BDS Swiss Markets Global Services Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on fileNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressUnit G25, Waterfront Studios, 1 Dock Road, London, United Kingdom, E16 1AH; Room 1302, 13/F, Cheong Kai Building, 84–86 Tak Po Road Central, Hong Kong; 200 Park Ave, 17th Fl, Ste 1733, New York, NY 10166-
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, ForexCryptocurrencies, Forex, Stocks, Futures
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish, Japanese
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare AVIC and BDS against other regulated peers in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: AVIC vs BDS

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: AVIC or BDS?

Both AVIC and BDS hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, AVIC maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas BDS maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between AVIC and BDS?

In Institutional Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), AVIC records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with BDS at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do AVIC and BDS differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

AVIC lists Cryptocurrencies, Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while BDS lists Cryptocurrencies, Forex, Stocks, Futures with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: AVIC or BDS?

AVIC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while BDS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

AVIC vs BDS (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Institutional Ledger