1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
bitFlyer vs Quadcode Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of bitFlyer (bitFlyer) and Quadcode Markets (Quad Code AU Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers
- bitFlyer 6D Score
- 5.0
- Quadcode Markets 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 4 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
bitFlyer outranks Quadcode Markets by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, bitFlyer holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Quadcode Markets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | bitFlyer | Quadcode Markets | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | bitFlyer |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | bitFlyer |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | bitFlyer |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | bitFlyer |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | bitFlyer |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: bitFlyer vs Quadcode Markets
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | bitFlyer | Quadcode Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | bitFlyer | Quad Code AU Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 4 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Midtown Tower, 9-7-1 Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-6233, Japan | '03' Se 23 L 23, 259 George Street, SYDNEY NSW 2000 Suite 23.03, Level 23, 259 George street, Sydney, NSW 2000 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Quadcode Markets Trading, Quadcode Markets |
| Supported Client Languages | Other languages, English, Japanese | Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Dutch, English, French, German, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare bitFlyer and Quadcode Markets against other regulated peers in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: bitFlyer vs Quadcode Markets
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: bitFlyer or Quadcode Markets?
bitFlyer holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 1). Specifically, bitFlyer maintains 4 total recorded filing(s) (NYSDFS, FSA, SEC, CSSF) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Quadcode Markets maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between bitFlyer and Quadcode Markets?
In Institutional Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), bitFlyer records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Quadcode Markets at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do bitFlyer and Quadcode Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
bitFlyer lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Quadcode Markets lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [Quadcode Markets Trading, Quadcode Markets]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: bitFlyer or Quadcode Markets?
bitFlyer carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Quadcode Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.