Skip to content
Institutional Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

extremelyproof vs iPromarkets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of extremelyproof (extremelyproof) and iPromarkets (Paxton Trade Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers

extremelyproof 6D Score
2.0
iPromarkets 6D Score
2.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: extremelyproof-vs-ipromarkets

extremelyproof and iPromarkets are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, extremelyproof holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas iPromarkets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightextremelyproofiPromarketsScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: extremelyproof vs iPromarkets

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: extremelyproof vs iPromarkets
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between extremelyproof and iPromarkets.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeextremelyproofiPromarkets
Primary Legal NameextremelyproofPaxton Trade Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on fileNone on file
Registered Domicile / Address76 Commercial Street, Edinburgh, MIdlothian, UNITED KINGDOM, EH6 6LXArchiepiskopou Makariou Iii,12, Kristellina Tower, 4Th Floor, Mesa Geitonia, Limassol
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Commodities, Forex, StocksCryptocurrencies, Indices, Stocks, Commodities, Bonds
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4MT4
Supported Client LanguagesSpanish, Portuguese, Italian, Filipino, Greek, Chinese, English, French, German, RussianSpanish, Arabic, Vietnamese, Chinese, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare extremelyproof and iPromarkets against other regulated peers in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: extremelyproof vs iPromarkets

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: extremelyproof or iPromarkets?

Both extremelyproof and iPromarkets hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, extremelyproof maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas iPromarkets maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between extremelyproof and iPromarkets?

In Institutional Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), extremelyproof records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with iPromarkets at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do extremelyproof and iPromarkets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

extremelyproof lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4], while iPromarkets lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Stocks, Commodities, Bonds with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: extremelyproof or iPromarkets?

extremelyproof carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while iPromarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

extremelyproof vs iPromarkets (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Institutional Ledger