Skip to content
Institutional Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FxPro vs UPbit: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FxPro (FXPRO UK Limited) and UPbit (UPbit) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers

FxPro 6D Score
7.2
UPbit 6D Score
5.6
Regulated Licences
4 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fxpro-vs-upbit

FxPro outranks UPbit by +1.6 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.2 vs 5.6)

On supervisory breadth, FxPro holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 6 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas UPbit holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFxProUPbitScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.25.6+1.6FxPro
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.05.4+1.6FxPro
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.03.0+2.0FxPro
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight8.15.3+2.8FxPro
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.05.5+1.5FxPro

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FxPro vs UPbit

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FxPro vs UPbit
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FxPro and UPbit.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFxProUPbit
Primary Legal NameFXPRO UK LimitedUPbit
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings4 regulated / 6 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
MAS: Not supplied
Registered Domicile / Address13-14 Basinghall str., City of London, EC2V 5BQ, UK Karyatidon 1, Ypsonas 4180, Cyprus 26, Boulevard des Moulins, Monaco, 98000 Albany Financial Center, South Ocean Boulevard, New Providence, The Bahamas.South Korea Seoul
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Metals, EnergiesCrypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5upbit IOS, upbit Android
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Polish, Czech, Hungarian, Dutch, Swedish, Bulgarian, Finnish, Lithuanian, Danish, Croatian, Estonian, Norwegian, Russian, Portuguese, Arabic, Indonesian, Malay, Korean, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Vietnamese, Thai, Mongolian, JapaneseChinese, English, Korean, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FxPro and UPbit against other regulated peers in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FxPro vs UPbit

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FxPro or UPbit?

FxPro holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 1). Specifically, FxPro maintains 6 total recorded filing(s) (BaFin, SCB, CYSEC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas UPbit maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (MAS) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FxPro and UPbit?

In Institutional Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FxPro records an Overall Score of 7.2 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 8.1, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with UPbit at 5.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.4, Brand: 5.3, Market Influence: 5.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do FxPro and UPbit differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FxPro lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Metals, Energies with execution software [MT4, MT5], while UPbit lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [upbit IOS, upbit Android]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FxPro or UPbit?

FxPro carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while UPbit carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FxPro vs UPbit (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Institutional Ledger