1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Luxtious vs OnFin: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Luxtious (INTERMARKETS Corp. Ltd) and OnFin (OnFin Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers
- Luxtious 6D Score
- 2.0
- OnFin 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Luxtious outranks OnFin by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Luxtious holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas OnFin holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Luxtious | OnFin | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Luxtious |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Luxtious |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | OnFin |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Luxtious |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Luxtious |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Luxtious vs OnFin
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Luxtious | OnFin |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | INTERMARKETS Corp. Ltd | OnFin Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | KM | Moheli Corporate Services LTD P.B. 1257 Bonovo Road, Fomboni, Comoros, KM |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities | Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | Indonesian, Spanish, English, Russian | Indonesian, Malay, English, Russian |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Luxtious and OnFin against other regulated peers in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Luxtious vs OnFin
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Luxtious or OnFin?
OnFin holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Luxtious maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas OnFin maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (MISA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Luxtious and OnFin?
In Institutional Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Luxtious records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with OnFin at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Luxtious and OnFin differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Luxtious lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while OnFin lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Luxtious or OnFin?
Luxtious carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while OnFin carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.