1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
MARKETS.COM vs Modmount: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of MARKETS.COM (MARKETS.COM) and Modmount (ModMount Services Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers
- MARKETS.COM 6D Score
- 3.0
- Modmount 6D Score
- 4.3
- Regulated Licences
- 3 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Modmount outranks MARKETS.COM by +1.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (4.3 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, MARKETS.COM holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Modmount holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | MARKETS.COM | Modmount | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 4.3 | +1.3 | Modmount |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Modmount |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Modmount |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 4.1 | +1.1 | Modmount |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | Modmount |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: MARKETS.COM vs Modmount
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | MARKETS.COM | Modmount |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | MARKETS.COM | ModMount Services Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | london | Room B11, First Floor, Providence Complex, Providence, Mahe, Seychelles. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Forex, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Bonds | Stock CFDs, Index CFDs, Cryptocurrencies, CFDs, Forex, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | markets.com, Trading platform, MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Bulgarian, Spanish, Italian, Arabic, English, French, German | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare MARKETS.COM and Modmount against other regulated peers in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: MARKETS.COM vs Modmount
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: MARKETS.COM or Modmount?
MARKETS.COM holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 0). Specifically, MARKETS.COM maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Modmount maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between MARKETS.COM and Modmount?
In Institutional Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), MARKETS.COM records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Modmount at 4.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 4.1, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do MARKETS.COM and Modmount differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
MARKETS.COM lists Cryptocurrencies, Forex, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Bonds with execution software [markets.com, Trading platform, MT4, MT5], while Modmount lists Stock CFDs, Index CFDs, Cryptocurrencies, CFDs, Forex, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: MARKETS.COM or Modmount?
MARKETS.COM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Modmount carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.