Skip to content
Institutional Ledger

Institution record

Bullish

Bullish Global

Risk level not supplied2 of 3 licences marked regulated
Source score
2.0
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
In our coverage
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht
Not suppliedRegulatedBullish Europe GmbH2024
In our coverage
Gibraltar Financial Services Commission
FSC1038FSARegulatedBullish (GI) Limited2021
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)
Not suppliedRegisteredBullish Global2023

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Bullish against peer institutions in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Bullish (this record)
BaFinGFSCFinancial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)
2 / 3Risk level not supplied2.00
Coinbase
BMAAMFMAS+6
9 / 9Risk level not supplied8.51
OKX
AMFMASVARA+6
9 / 9Risk level not supplied7.21
Binance DEX
FSAAMFVARA+11
12 / 14Risk level not supplied5.00
Mizuho Securities
SFCMASFSA+4
6 / 7Risk level not supplied4.00
Bitpanda Wallet
FMAFMABaFin+3
5 / 6Risk level not supplied2.50

Bullish: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Bullish's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Bullish (legal entity reference: Bullish Global) holds 3 recorded licence entries, of which 2 carry a "regulated" status and 3 are marked regulated or registered: BaFin (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; GFSC (Gibraltar Financial Services Commission) — licence FSC1038FSA, status: regulated; Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) — licence Not supplied, status: registered. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official BaFin, GFSC, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) public register.

Which of Bullish's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

This directory focuses on crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers. 2 of Bullish's 3 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: BaFin (licence Not supplied, regulated, entity: Bullish Europe GmbH); GFSC (licence FSC1038FSA, regulated, entity: Bullish (GI) Limited). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.

What is Bullish's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Bullish carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 2.0, risk & licensing: 2.0, brand: 2.0, market influence: 2.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Bullish's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Bullish, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (bullish.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to BaFin.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from Institutional Ledger relevant to Bullish's supervisory scope.

All research →

Institutional Custody & Digital Ledger

Institutional Tokenized Treasuries, Wholesale CBDC Delivery-versus-Payment (DvP), and BCBS SCO60 Bank Capital Standards in 2026

An institutional ledger deep dive into $3.2B+ tokenized US Treasury funds, intraday bilateral and cleared repo collateral mobility, BIS Project Agorá and MAS Project Guardian atomic DvP settlement, and BCBS SCO60 Group 1a/1b vs Group 2 (1,250% risk weight) prudential capital treatment.

Read briefing →

Tokenized RWA & Custody

DTCC Smart NAV Pilot, Canton Network Institutional Repo Mobility & Tokenized Money Market Fund Intraday Collateral Settlement

Tokenized Money Market Fund (TMMF) intraday collateral settlement refers to atomic Delivery-versus-Payment (DvP) transfers that cut tri-party repo margin buffers by 38% [38% + Margin Reduction + BIS Working Paper No. 1184 + Q3 2026] across DTCC Smart NAV and Canton Network rails.

Read briefing →

market-insights

IMF-World Bank Bangkok Meetings 2026: Debt, AI, and Ukraine Dominate as China Fades from Center Stage

The world’s finance chiefs see new risks — and less China angst: Summary of the supplied material covering 2018, SFC. Source details have not been independently verified.

Read briefing →

market-insights

HSBC CEO Warns the AI Boom Won't Make Every Data Center a Good Bet

HSBC CEO warns the AI boom won’t make every data center a good bet: Summary of the supplied material covering SFC, FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.

Read briefing →
Bullish — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | Institutional Ledger