1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
AFFX vs Quadcode Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of AFFX (Asia Future Trading Corporation Ltd) and Quadcode Markets (Quad Code AU Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers
- AFFX 6D Score
- 2.0
- Quadcode Markets 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
AFFX and Quadcode Markets are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, AFFX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Quadcode Markets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | AFFX | Quadcode Markets | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: AFFX vs Quadcode Markets
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | AFFX | Quadcode Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Asia Future Trading Corporation Ltd | Quad Code AU Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 6148 Klongtoey Nua, Wattana, Bangkok 10110 | '03' Se 23 L 23, 259 George Street, SYDNEY NSW 2000 Suite 23.03, Level 23, 259 George street, Sydney, NSW 2000 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Quadcode Markets Trading, Quadcode Markets |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Thai | Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Dutch, English, French, German, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare AFFX and Quadcode Markets against other regulated peers in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: AFFX vs Quadcode Markets
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: AFFX or Quadcode Markets?
Quadcode Markets holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, AFFX maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Quadcode Markets maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between AFFX and Quadcode Markets?
In Institutional Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), AFFX records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Quadcode Markets at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do AFFX and Quadcode Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
AFFX lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT5], while Quadcode Markets lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [Quadcode Markets Trading, Quadcode Markets]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: AFFX or Quadcode Markets?
AFFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Quadcode Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.