Skip to content
Institutional Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

CoinJar vs Quadcode Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CoinJar (CoinJar) and Quadcode Markets (Quad Code AU Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers

CoinJar 6D Score
5.0
Quadcode Markets 6D Score
2.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: coinjar-vs-quadcode-markets

CoinJar outranks Quadcode Markets by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, CoinJar holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Quadcode Markets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightCoinJarQuadcode MarketsScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.02.0+3.0CoinJar
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.02.0+3.0CoinJar
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.01.0+2.0CoinJar
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.02.0+3.0CoinJar
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.02.0+3.0CoinJar

Visual Architecture Benchmark: CoinJar vs Quadcode Markets

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: CoinJar vs Quadcode Markets
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between CoinJar and Quadcode Markets.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeCoinJarQuadcode Markets
Primary Legal NameCoinJarQuad Code AU Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressLevel 17, 600 Bourke St, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia'03' Se 23 L 23, 259 George Street, SYDNEY NSW 2000 Suite 23.03, Level 23, 259 George street, Sydney, NSW 2000
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCrypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment productsCryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsCoinJar: Buy Bitcoin InstantlyQuadcode Markets Trading, Quadcode Markets
Supported Client LanguagesOther languages, EnglishSpanish, Portuguese, Italian, Dutch, English, French, German, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare CoinJar and Quadcode Markets against other regulated peers in our crypto exchanges and digital-asset service providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: CoinJar vs Quadcode Markets

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CoinJar or Quadcode Markets?

CoinJar holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, CoinJar maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (AUSTRAC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Quadcode Markets maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CoinJar and Quadcode Markets?

In Institutional Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CoinJar records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Quadcode Markets at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do CoinJar and Quadcode Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

CoinJar lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [CoinJar: Buy Bitcoin Instantly], while Quadcode Markets lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [Quadcode Markets Trading, Quadcode Markets]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CoinJar or Quadcode Markets?

CoinJar carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Quadcode Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

CoinJar vs Quadcode Markets (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Institutional Ledger